Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Piccadilly line extension to Cockfosters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep - improper venue. Please use WP:MFD for talk pages that are to be deleted in isolation. Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 13:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Piccadilly line extension to Cockfosters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I would like to nominate this page to be merged into the Piccadilly line article as that basically sums up all the points in this article. Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 12:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Vincent LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 12:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Procedural close. Presumably you didn't mean to nominate the talk page of this article, but the article itself.  In any case, you don't propose that the article should be deleted, so this is not for AfD.  Per WP:MERGEPROP, put a proposal on Talk:Piccadilly line to suggest this. YorkshireLad  ✿  (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.