Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tall Hajar, Jarabulus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Tall Hajar, Jarabulus

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Primary sources are not taken into consideration. A village I doubt that few outside Syria have heard of before. There is nothing noticeable about it in the news and the secondary sources that we rely on in the first place. Dl.thinker (talk) 03:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. According to WP:GEOLAND, Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. There are thousands of pages for villages in Wikipedia; whether anyone from a different part of the world has heard of it is totally irrelevant. Aintabli (talk) 03:32, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Syria. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 05:01, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: the article passes WP:GEOLAND because it is a populated place. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 06:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep no valid deletion rationale. Mccapra (talk) 06:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep All populated places are notable per WP:GEOLAND. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:31, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.