Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talmadge Lee Carter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:33, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Talmadge Lee Carter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability since February of 2011. I didn't find much, if any, evidence of coverage that would demonstrate notability. Lepricavark (talk) 06:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 06:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 06:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 06:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)


 * A fairly standard US judge. This could be improved but I doubt the subject would become much better than it is right now. And there are always problems with trying to pass on notability from cases a judge has presided over. He doesn’t seem to have invented any important principles or written any books. Dysklyver  10:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Minor low level member of the judiciary. Emeraude (talk) 12:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being a county court judge might get a person into Wikipedia if he can be reliably sourced as the subject of enough media coverage to clear WP:GNG, but it's not a role that confers automatic inclusion rights just because he exists. As well, this is written more like a résumé than an encyclopedia article, and is referenced entirely to primary sources that cannot support notability rather than to reliable ones. Bearcat (talk) 16:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.