Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talmud Jmmanuel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Billy Meier.  MBisanz  talk 00:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Talmud Jmmanuel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It says something about the obscurity of this hoax by UFOlogist Billy Meier that the best source I could find about it was in the preface of a woo-woo self-published commentary on the Book of Enoch (see ). There's a very brief, fugitive reference in a scholarly work on "visitors from another world" religion, but by and large the references to this are from other books in its milieu. Perhaps there's room for a brief mention in Meier's article but I question at this point how we would source it; his article is way too long as it is. Mangoe (talk) 15:33, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Billy Meier. Billy Meier's claims have some following within the UFO and New Age communities, so "Talmud Jmmanuel" is a somewhat frequently used search term (the article was viewed 2305 times in December 2012).  However, my searches did not uncover the sort of WP:RS required to justify its existence as a separate article. --Mike Agricola (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * delete and redirect to author - unless there is some reason for a non-sourced article. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Merged material still needs sourcing, and I agree that Meier's article is sufficiently long. No RS, no article. All the best,  Mini  apolis  00:32, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nomination. Low notability; sources are not adequate to build neutral content. bobrayner (talk) 15:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.