Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talus Lake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Talus Lake

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GEONATURAL which requires that ""information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist". BEFORE searched returned only passing mentions in hiking guides and various lists of natural features, none of which provide any information about the lake beyond its location and basic characteristics. –dlthewave ☎ 16:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Wyoming. –dlthewave ☎ 16:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park, not notable enough for a separate article. Reywas92Talk 19:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Agree with above. --Bduke (talk) 06:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park: the lake does not pass any notability guideline so it does not deserve its own article. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 08:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Lakes of Grand Teton National Park. There is simply not enough information to make an encyclopaedic article about this lake. The nom.'s case is correct, and GEOLAND says The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. The more general article exists and the lake is included in the redirect target. Per Reywas92, this is not notable for a seperate article. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 06:47, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. Okoslavia (talk) 03:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.