Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamás Tomkiss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:19, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Tamás Tomkiss

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No independent reliable sources cited to prove notability Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:15, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 19:16, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I really don't think it is necessary to do that as it is obvious you want it deleted from your nomination. Tavix (talk) 19:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per nomination. JamesBurns (talk) 23:49, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: all references are from the source himself and he is not notable --Cs california (talk) 04:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  StarM  23:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * VComment A translation of the article in the Hungarian WP, but i have no way to judge the notability--it would depend probably on the notability of the review he was editor of, but that doesn't seem to have an article here or there. The same person entered the article on both the same day, so they havent had a chance to judge it either. DGG (talk) 04:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think we already have a consensus here on what needs to happen.  JBsupreme (talk) 08:27, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.