Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tama Hochbaum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 16:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Tama Hochbaum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Created by COI, all the content comes from them (a gallery connected to this artist). Cannot find significant independent coverage in reliable sources, ergo fails GNG. Rayman60 (talk) 00:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 00:29, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment I see a review at SFGATE and another in a college publication.104.163.140.141 (talk) 01:09, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * @Ping Megalibrarygirl as she has access to better databases.104.163.140.141 (talk) 01:11, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll help out soon. It's been a crazy day! :P Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I came up pretty empty with library databases, other than two reproductions of her work. Is there a suitable way to include those? (HOCHBAUM, TAMA. "Nicholas Brothers II, 2015." Eleven Eleven, no. 19, Nov. 2015, p. 28; Hochbaum, Tama. "Friends School Tree [Detail] [Art Reproduction]." Modern Painters, vol. 22, no. 1, Apr. 2010, p. 6. -Kenirwin/ (talk) 16:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep -- I've just added links to several more meaningful articles; they'll require some work to bring the content into the article, but they reflect the kind of coverage that I'd want to see in the entry: -Kenirwin/ (talk) 16:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I found this: http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A490361798/GPS?u=wikipedia&sid=GPS&xid=c72957a8 Vexations (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep There are sufficient independent, reliable sources that provide in-depth coverage to sustain an article. Vexations (talk) 19:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: the work is in the collection of the Museum of fine arts Boston. Theredproject (talk) 00:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I found this: http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A490361798/GPS?u=wikipedia&sid=GPS&xid=c72957a8 Vexations (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep There are sufficient independent, reliable sources that provide in-depth coverage to sustain an article. Vexations (talk) 19:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: the work is in the collection of the Museum of fine arts Boston. Theredproject (talk) 00:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: the work is in the collection of the Museum of fine arts Boston. Theredproject (talk) 00:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.