Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamar.com (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete (WP:CSD) by

Tamar.com
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indications that this company has been the subject of significant third party coverage. Many of the citations given are dead-links. In general, the "Awards" noted are the typical awards that any company might pick up by applying to enough different trade groups. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:56, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Given that the reference retrieval dates predate the most recent AfD in Nov-Dec 2015, is this effectively a repost (albeit by a new WP:SPA account) - in which case it should be a CSD G4? AllyD (talk) 16:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Repeating my rationale from the previous AfD deletion less than 6 months ago: "My searches are not turning up evidence that this is more than a Marketing/SEO firm going about its business. No encyclopaedic notability; fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG." I see nothing in the current article or in new searches to revise that view. AllyD (talk) 16:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.