Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara, Queen of the Mermaids


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:23, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Tamara, Queen of the Mermaids

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Tags on the article says it all. The article is nothing but plot summary and no sources. And this is too early of a character to meet WP:GNG. I purpose either deletion or merge List of Pirates of the Caribbean characters. Jhenderson 7 7 7  15:30, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Merge: with great regret but I doubt that there is even enough material to merge. It seems to be wholly original research or conjecture. Eqdoktor (talk) 17:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge - No notability. There is no coverage in reliable sources shown. Blake (Talk·Edits) 18:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, if the whole content is "original research or conjecture", there isn't even anything to merge. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:17, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Wait: This movie has only just be released and the page is brand new. While it indeed might turn out that this page will need to be deleted, its unprofessional to jump up and try to delete it right away. Allow time for an article to develop and then and only then bring the article up for deletion IF it warrents it. Come one guys, this is nooby stuff, a little professionalism, please.The Matrix Prime (talk) 20:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * It doesn't work that way with a fictional character. What your wanting is more what Wikia does. A fictional character doesn't normally warrant having his/her own article until notability is proven and that takes time. We have the list article to talk about her if we need to. Jhenderson  7 7 7  20:59, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to List of Pirates of the Caribbean characters per nom. Does not show any notability, and I doubt that there are third-party independent reliable sources discussing the character non-trivially. Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 21 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not a legitimate search term; doesn't deserve its own redirect. Categorically fails WP:GNG on every criteria. — Chromancer  talk/cont 16:19, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The fictional character does not meet the general notability guideline and the article does not provide reliable third-party sources independent of the subject that treat in detail the character. It is an unsupported and unneeded content fork that provides only a plot-only description of a fictional work with no reception or significance. Jfgslo (talk) 23:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.