Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara Tarasiewicz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Tamara Tarasiewicz
Notability not established for this painter who really hasn't been painting that long. Only thing comes close is that she established her own gallery, which is like publishing your own book. Article creator removed speedy tag twice without following proper WP procedures Akradecki 14:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable artist (article does not meet requirements for speedy deletion). Kafziel 14:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment How does it not meet A7? Importance is not asserted in the article. Even so, the creator doesn't have the right to arbitrarily remove speedy tags. Akradecki 14:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * How does it meet A7? Clearly, the bit about the gallery is intended to be an assertion of notability. Whether or not it qualifies is a matter for AfD, in my opinion. We shouldn't be too slapdash with the "no assertion of notability" clause. Kafziel 14:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't say I agree with nom on the "hasn't been painting that long" part, as the article says she's been painting for almost 20 years. In any case, unreferenced, unverifiable, WP:BIO, etc etc etc. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Speedy or otherwise as not notable. Marcus22 15:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.