Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamara Thiérus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Tamara Thiérus

 * – ( View AfD View log )

BLP of a college ice hockey player. She does not pass WP:COLLATH and there isn’t enough for a GNG pass either. Mccapra (talk) 08:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete – Spitzmauskc (talk) 14:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nondescript college player, article sourced entirely from primary sources and blogs. Fails NCOLLATH, NHOCKEY and the GNG, all three.   Ravenswing      15:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. NCAA is not a level of play that automatically confers an inclusion freebie on every individual player in the league — it's a level where you have to earn major distinctions to get in the wikidoor. But this claims nothing of the sort, and is not referenced anywhere near well enough to claim that she would pass GNG in lieu: three of the five footnotes are primary source content self-published by her own team, one is a glancing namecheck of her existence in a sports blog entry that isn't about her, and one is a very short blurb in her hometown local newspaper about her attending hockey camp (which is not an "inherently" notable context that would clinch her notability right then and there.) Nothing here, either in the content or in the quality of the sourcing available to support it, is enough. Bearcat (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't find any sources that would indicate they pass WP:GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 17:22, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non notable player. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.