Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamas Erdelyi (mathematician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --Darkwind (talk) 22:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Tamas Erdelyi (mathematician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Professor that fails WP:PROF. No 3rd party reliable sources to back up achievements. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC) Appears that I am wrong and this guy does have enough criteria to meet PROF. Nom redacted, somebody, please close. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep   99 peer-reviewed papers, Web of science shows 10 with citations or more. Mathematics is a relatively low-citation discipline, but the number of peer-reviewed  publications seems to show him an authority in his subject ,as confirmed by his  coauthorship of a book in a major series, and his full professorship at a leading research university. DGG ( talk ) 06:11, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG; this is a full professor, at a major research university, with a huge stack of publications. When does he sleep? Bearian (talk) 19:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Can the nominator explain how this is not a textbook allowing the subject to meet Criterion 4 of WP:PROF? Abductive  (reasoning) 20:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.