Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tameka Norris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --BDD (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Tameka Norris

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient notability for WP:Artist; article created and maintained by at least three WP:COI/WP:SPA editors - see Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:11, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:40, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:40, 20 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:ARTIST #4 "has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition". Norris's work has been shown at the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston; in "Gifted and Talented" (curated by Clifford Owens) at Third Streaming Gallery, New York (called "one of the city's most interesting art spaces to have opened its doors in the past couple of years" by Art in America); and in Prospect New Orleans biennial (curated by Dan Cameron). (note: these three sources are WP:GNG material, plus a few other GNG sources in the article ref's). Re the COI maybe we can tag the article and leave notice on user talk pages. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 06:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep for the reasons given above by Green Cardamom. Squareanimal (talk) 14:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 22:32, 6 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per Green Cardamom. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.