Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tami Erin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Shereth 21:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Tami Erin

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Actress, but doesn't appear to meet the requirements for WP:N. rootology ( T ) 21:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete-fails WP:N, WP:ACTOR, WP:BIO, and per this, she hasn't done that much work.-- S R X  22:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - subject meets the primary criteria for notability with coverage of her in mainstream press such as the Washington Post as shown by a Google news search. The actor is also plays the title character for Pippi Longstocking, and the performance was bad enough to be honoured with a Razzie nomination for Worst New Star. -- Whpq (talk) 16:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies WP:N, WP:V, as noted by Whpq; also, per appearances on major national TV shows Good Morning America, The Today Show, and Entertainment Tonight. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 04:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per SRX. I'm only seeing one reference and being bad enough to merit only a nomination from a barely notable award doesn't qualify this subject for an article. You said it Dad (talk) 02:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, in agreement with Whpq. Erin played a key role in a full feature film and was nominated for a notable award for her role in the movie. Fanficgurl 9:13 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Jack-a-Roe. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Razzie nomination is not an obscure or barely-notable thing, it's actually quite important.  Enough that we shouldn't be in a rush to delete: the topic is reasonable.  Here is a Google News Archive search, with many sources that can be used:  Mango juice talk 18:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.