Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tami Farrell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 14:42, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Tami Farrell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ferrell is only really notable for being Miss Teen USA, but that is not enough on itself to make her notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:15, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep JPL's claim that being Miss Teen USA national titleholder is non-notable is disingenuous. Subject meets notability criteria and article is well sourced.  PageantUpdater (talk) 12:58, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: passes GNG. Also agree with PageantUpdater that these mass nominations, which seem to not consider GNG at all, are very problematic.   p  b  p  19:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep – Miss Teen USA is notable by itself. MB298 (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: I am making my decision based on the fact that there is multiple secondary sources, and a controversy that tends to attract attention, and not on the possible tainted copy pasted reasoning that an editor is problematic. Otr500 (talk) 11:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment see also Articles for deletion/Kristi Addis‎ - Miss Teen USA 1987 also up for AFD PageantUpdater (talk) 03:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above as a WP:GNG pass. Ejgreen77 (talk) 23:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: passes WP:GNG with the Miss Teen USA win. CrispyGlover (talk) 20:43, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks like lots of coverage.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.