Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamkeen Insurance Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 12:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Tamkeen Insurance Company

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not having indepth, independent coverage. Fails wp:org. Behind the moors (talk) 10:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 10:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 10:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Behind the moors (talk) 10:22, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Hi. This article represents (Tamkeen Insurance Company) a real company with a legal presence, and this company is the most prominent company in the State of Palestine, and it is the only company in the Levant region that deals with the Islamic system, and it also represents the first idea of ​​Islamic insurance in the Arab world, and it is Meets encyclopedic standards for companies and institutions. I hope that the article will not be deleted, and also the article contains reliable, clear and unbiased sources, and many sources can be added that express the company's legal presence, The company also owns 10% of the Palestinian financial market related to insurance, which is the largest percentage owned by a company in Palestine, and the company's article achieves comprehensiveness and contains impartial and reliable sources. Osps7 (talk) 12:19, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:32, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Delete  All of this content comes from a single source: "Market Publishers". The WSJ sources are just the stock price. I did a search and this company to completely fail WP:CORPDEPTH.  It's possible I'd change my mind if someone produced some solid secondary sources in Arabic, but there doesn't seem to be anything in English.  -- Bob drobbs (talk) 05:06, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Delete  I agree with what Bob drobbs said. Also if better sources can be found, I am willing to change my vote. Chelokabob (talk) 09:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I also agree with Bob above. WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 21:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.