Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tams ONE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 22:56, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Tams ONE

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable music entity per ,, and. Fails WP:MUSIC and basic WP:NOTE guidelines as nearly all references to the group are unreliable or short mentions.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 06:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 06:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Poss WP:CSD, since it seems we've been here before.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 07:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It does not qualify for G4 as the two previous deletions were speedys. - Icewedge (talk) 08:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:MUSIC and secondarily there are some very clear COI/SPAM problems here too. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Themfromspace (talk) 00:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.