Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tan Cressida


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Earl Sweatshirt. (non-admin closure) —  Yash talk  stalk 06:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Tan Cressida

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. There are a number of mentions in reliable sources announcing the formation of this company, such as this and this, but little else. Does not appear to meet the criteria of a company worth notice by Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge with Earl Sweatshirt as with majority of record labels associated with hip hop artists this is not notable on its own. Karst (talk) 11:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Earl Sweatshirt (instead of merging). I support a redirect here. However, I do not support a merge as the content is unsourced. It also leaves a messy attribution redirect permanently. I would suggest to redirect this article with history preserved. That allows editors to lookup the history and find sources and add the information if required. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Earl Sweatshirt; Wikipedia does not need two articles on these closely related subject. No reason for a merge, as the content is unsourced. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.