Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TanaCon: What Really Happened


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as G5, G7. (non-admin closure) — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 11:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

TanaCon: What Really Happened

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article about a documentary released direct to streaming video with little to no non-routine coverage in reliable sources. The article in Teen Vogue citing a documentary about the same thing winning a Streamy Award is about a different documentary with a different title, produced by a different person - Shane Dawson, not Michael Weist. FalconK (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

MOVED FROM TALK PAGE: This page should not be speedily deleted because... (valid sources and formatting that meets requirements for inclusion on wikipedia according to notability and such guidelines for film along with edits from other admins, and even a discussion of talk page with recommendations taken by editor) --2603:3018:1402:FB00:C0A7:305B:DEA6:A74E (talk) 02:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * moved from talk page

Even a quick google search will show multiple top news site coverages, it was also heavily referenced on social media by several involved parties. Also features established names in the industry. This film is verified on social media, the one on Amazon - not the one mentioned above.
 * Meets notability requirements for film Narwhal90 (talk) 14:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

There was 2 different films and documentaries - one by Shane Dawson on Youtube (as mentioned above) - and this one regarding the article in questions by Michael Weist on Amazon.


 * a few helpful links

Narwhal90 (talk) 14:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This MAY be eligible for speedy deletion if consents, as he is the only non-block-evading editor with substantial contributions.  Criteria would be a "WP:G6" combination of db-banned for part of it and db-author for the rest.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  17:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with that. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Nominated for speedy deletion:   davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  16:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Tagged as G5 and G7 so admins going through Category:Candidates for speedy deletion don't have to go through the "undefined reason" category. Justarandomamerican (talk) Also, have a nice day! 15:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - as per above, G8 applies, so speedy deletion is appropriate. 174.212.238.174 (talk) 03:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:G8? "Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page"? Please clarify.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  15:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It's likely a typo of WP:G7, from what I can tell. Justarandomamerican (talk) Also, have a nice day! 15:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.