Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanakert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Anaqut. Tone 19:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Tanakert

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are no sources listed to verify the existence of this place, quick google search returns no results when searched in plain English and in native languages, this place may also not meed notability guidelines due to its insignificance. Theprussian (talk) 16:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per User:Theprussian. Some places are so small and insignicant that covering them all is not practical. No coverage from reliable sources as well.Knox490 (talk) 03:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Anaqut for which this is a transliteration of a previous Armenian name according to the article on Armenian Wikipedia.--Pontificalibus 16:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:18, 28 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Pontificalibus. SportingFlyer  T · C  20:33, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: I just restored content into the article, ALL OF WHICH HAD BEEN DELETED by the deletion nominator. Hey, User:Theprussian, you are not allowed to do that, or in other words it is highly unproductive for everyone if you do something like that.  You can't trash an article, just before or during an AFD.  The multiple other editors who you have effectively invited to come evaluate the article would then have nothing to see.  You're not allowed to "win" by trashing it.  Instead, let others see what is the dealio (technical term).  Otherwise it looks like you are trashing it in order to "win" by preventing others from seeing the content. --Doncram (talk) 22:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * An absolutely incorrect move, but the content was removed after my !vote, and no intervening !votes were made, so fortunately no ill effect. SportingFlyer  T · C  23:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.