Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanaya Beatty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per sk1 & all that (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 14:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Tanaya Beatty

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nomination withdrawn by nominator Flat Out (talk) 06:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Subject has not received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable and intellectually independent of each other and independent of the subject. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:GNG Flat Out (talk) 04:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * ?? Did you happen to miss this and this? Not exactly "mere mentions".  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep and expand with more of the available and unused sourcing as this person (even if seen slightly poor in SIGCOV by some) now meets WP:ENT (prong 1) with her multiple significant roles. While back in 2011 with her single significant role she would not have passed ENT, it is nice that since that time she has acquired significant roles in multiple notable project. Now a suitable and improvable stub that benefits Wikipedia and its readers.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per the previous deletion attempt, the actress has already met WP:GNG by having been billed as a starring actress in two previous television series, as well as with the addition of even more reliable coverage. Enough content has been provided to more than establish coverage for the actress. Silver Buizel (talk) 13:35, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:ENT #1. The coverage is not yet as detailed as one might like, but she does pass the guideline and there is enough verifiable information for a starter article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:22, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per above (Mainly MQS) - Sources aren't perfect but notability is there. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:38, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.