Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanaza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that the lack of independent reliable sourcing mandates deletion here. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Tanaza

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable start-up. It has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Edcolins (talk) 19:37, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * I scrolled the first 3 pages of Google results and listed some of the links that I found. I will need some help to understand which ones are totally insignificant, as most of them seems to be written by independent bloggers / industry experts, newspapaers, startup-related publications. What can make all of them irrelevant?


 * http://www.dailywireless.org/2013/03/26/tanaza-new-cloud-control-firmware/
 * http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2012/12/15/the-2012-simply-wi-fi-awards-the-nominees-are.html
 * http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2012/7/14/my-thoughts-after-a-chat-with-the-ceo-of-tanaza.html
 * http://www.simplywifi.co/blog/2012/10/29/watch-as-i-pull-a-cloud-managed-ap-from-my-hat.html
 * http://www.universitybusiness.com/news/tanaza-releases-features-help-wi-fi-hotspots
 * http://jenniferhuber.blogspot.it/2012/10/tanaza-cloud-management-of-diverse.html
 * https://milan.the-hub.net/2013/05/wi-fi-piu-semplice-ad-hub-milano-grazie-a-tanaza/
 * http://www.cwnp.com/cwnp_wifi_blog/wireless-field-day-3-tanaza/
 * http://techvangelist.net/tanaza-at-wfd3/
 * http://www.eu-startups.com/2012/05/interview-with-sebastiano-bertani-tanaza/
 * http://www.smbnation.com/content/news/entry/tanaza-releases-cloud-control-170-solution-for-network-management
 * http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/notizie/2012-09-06/techcrunch-detto-stop-ecco-124828.shtml?uuid=AbJoNLZG&fromSearch
 * http://www.dailywireless.org/2013/02/15/tanaza-cloud-control-of-openwrt-routers/
 * Patro-claus (talk) 21:49, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The 13 references you listed do not show that the company has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. See in that respect Notability (organizations and companies). Blogs such as references 1-4, 6, 8-11, 13 are largely not acceptable (see WP:USERG). References 5, 7 appear to have been directly or indirectly published by the company (see WP:CORPDEPTH), i.e. they do not appear to be independent sources. The TechCrunch reference (reference 11) is acceptable as such but only contains a passing mention of the company amongst quite a few other companies. Thus, so far, we haven't enough coverage to keep the article. --Edcolins (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I limited a Google search to articles written in Italian and still couldn't find any good references. If Italian press doesn't cover an Italian company, then I think it is unlikely that other reliable secondary sources will be found.--Nowa (talk) 02:36, 10 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:01, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  01:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:40, 19 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:GNG. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.