Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tania Antoshina (artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Tania Antoshina (artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

References do not suggest the subject is notable  CatcherStorm    talk   17:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep and try to improve for now. Claims of being part of permanent collections of Russian Museum and Tretyakov Gallery make her pass WP:ARTIST with no doubt. Problem is that her name is not always transliterated as Tania Antoshina. Sometimes she goes as Tatyana Antoshina, Tatiana Antoshina, etc. I am looking for Russian references as well. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and add citations/references. Artist is notable. The Venice Biennial show cites other museum and major exhibitions: Moscow State Russian Museum, St. Petersburg, The State Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow, The National Center for Contemporary Art (NCCA), Moscow, MUMOK, Wien, Neues Museum Weserburg, Bremen, National Museum of Women in the Arts, Washington DC, Corcoran Art Museum, Washington DC, and Casoria Contemporary Art Museum, Naples. All of those need to be added as citations, and this article would pass notability. Netherzone (talk) 19:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The references do suggest that Antoshina is notable. Books, scholarly articles and collections are all indicators that she meets practically every criterion in WP:ARTIST. Mduvekot (talk) 16:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. More than enough sources to establish notability. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 18:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - judging by the listed collections, she passes notability. Also, the sources indicate she's been included in at least one biographical dictionary, which ought to be enough. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 20:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above.♦ Dr. Blofeld  12:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.