Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tania Pleitez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 06:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Tania Pleitez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG. Has been in the CAT:NN backlog for over 11 years. Boleyn (talk) 19:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NAUTHOR. One of her essays is reviewed here and, unless I'm mistaken, she's also a poet and the subject of this paper: "La poesía de Tania Pleitez Vela: memoria y rememoración". pburka (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * ... and move to Tania Pleitez Vela. pburka (talk) 20:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. On a promising road, but for now I'd say, overall, she does not pass the average professor test of WP:NPROF, nor (analogously) an average author/poet test. Somewhat low number of citations, even considering her low-cited field. Plus, I'd expect more than two or three secondary sources talking about the work of a poet/author to establish WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR, even if they were blog posts, and I am not convinced she is notable in this sense yet (WP:TOOSOON). Walwal20 talk ▾ contribs 23:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't think the fact that the citation counts are low is particularly meaningful; she's not a scientist, and I would expect them to be low in this subject, even for notable people. It would be a fallacy to say that many notable people have low citations and hers are low so she's notable; I think we have to look elsewhere instead. But, looking at reviews, she appears to have no books of her own. We have (as listed above by pburka) a single review of a volume edited by someone else that has one of its 12 chapters by the subject, and another published article specifically about the subject's poetry. I don't think the first of these counts for much at all. The second one seems a lot more significant to me, and comparable to a single published book review, but it's still only one source, and it's the only such source I found. I don't think it's enough for WP:PROF, WP:AUTHOR, WP:GNG, or any of our notability criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I think might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.