Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tania Russof (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Tania Russof
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Total absence of suitable sourcing and pornbio is no longer an argument & this BLPfils GNG and ENT. Spartaz Humbug! 14:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 15:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - All coverage is either non-notable porn stuff or junky gossip rags. Nothing that I can see to qualify the subject for WP:GNG. Missvain (talk) 05:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:27, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Agree with Missvain. Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG MaskedSinger (talk) 15:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:BASIC and WP:ENTERTAINER. No independent RS coverage in the article.  An independent search for RS coverage gets interviews and incidental mentions in relation to Pierre Woodman. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 29 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.