Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanja Bruske


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Tanja Bruske

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't meet WP:GNG, coverage in reliable independent sources doesn't rise much above mere-mentions. Doesn't meet WP:NAUTHOR, none of her works appear to be notable by enWiki or deWiki standards. Originally accepted out of the new pages queue by, who has since been blocked for accepting articles for pay.

Review of sources:
 * mere mention
 * not independent, Bruske is an editor at the GNZ
 * not reliable
 * review of a local theater production that Bruske wrote
 * appears to be the personal blog of a colleague
 * database entry, doesn't mention the subject

I was also able to find some more local coverage that doesn't say much about the subject. signed,Rosguill talk 21:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * delete Also I couldn't find much about Tanja Bruske. Tanja Bruskes mentions are mainly through the the books which are on sale on Amazon or elsewhere. Her main publisher Mainbook (a local publisher probably named thanks to a wordplay with the river Main in Germany), doesn't have a Wikipedia page either. The founder of the publishing house Gerd Fischer is also not really notable, the authors published by the publishing house neither.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:08, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 21:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 21:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per excellent reasoning of the nominator Spiderone  08:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:SIGCOV. Bearian (talk) 17:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.