Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanna Island Kastom Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. unencyclopaedic, obvious copyright violation Jimfbleak (talk) 06:29, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Tanna Island Kastom Law

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't know what this is, but I don't think it belongs on Wikipedia. Can't think of an easily applicable CSD criteria, or I'd speedy delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:49, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  03:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. While I don't have access to this source, based on the structure and wording of the article, I think it's overwhelmingly likely that this is a copyvio of this work. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I had tried looking for a source, cause I got the same feeling from the wording/structure, but I couldn't find an original that this was a copyvio of to G12 with. I will take a look and see if I can see that source (or find another) with my university account when I get home. Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 16:02, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.