Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanner McCalister


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  13:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Tanner McCalister

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another contested draft with zero improvement, and zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources which are not routine sports coverage. Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:37, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football,  and Texas.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:38, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG. Themanwithnowifi (talk) 13:14, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - There's enough there and there's more on Google News.KatoKungLee (talk) 14:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes GNG, see for example Dayton Daily News, SI (2), and Cleveland.com (2). BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per BeanieFan11's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 21:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete While resources are quantity-wise Ok, missing in-depth coverage from independent sources, no Knowledge Panel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citations101 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Huh? BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Even not checking the sources now in the article, BeanieFan11's sources show adequate coverage from independent sources to meet GNG, whether or not it has a Knowledge Panel, whatever that is. Rlendog (talk) 17:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.