Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanseer Saji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Clear hoax and deleting accordingly (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:41, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Tanseer Saji

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another editor placed a Prod on this article with the rationale "Absolutely no hits on Google. There needs to be independent, reliable references per WP:SOURCES" The notice was removed, along with the maintenance tags, by the article creator, User:Tanzeersaji, without either comment or addressing the issues. I am bringing it to AfD as there is no evidence that this person meets the WP:MUSICBIO criteria. AllyD (talk) 10:20, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Hed PE per usual practice. --Michig (talk) 17:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment is there any proof that he has actually ever been member of Hed PE? It seems unlikely considering that he is apparently only 15 years old. Asilv (talk) 23:28, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If he isn't a member then delete it, and delete any mention of him from the articles (which doesn't have to wait for the AfD to end). --Michig (talk) 06:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm did the original Prod, so AllyD has listed my misgivings. There is no evidence that Tanseer Saji, 15-year old from India, is a member of Hardcore Punk group from California, therefore no redirect is needed. The editor "Tanzeersaji" has been trying to put his name to the group since August and tried creating the article "Tanseer HEM" saying the band had changed its name. Bgwhite (talk) 05:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No google hits, and no evidence to verify the claims made in the article - looks a likely WP:HOAX to me. — sparklism  hey! 13:43, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.