Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tansprocess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as WP:A11 (obviously invented) and WP:G11 (unambiguous promotion). A search shows that at best, this is just something someone came up with WP:ONEDAY that never caught on with the academic or mainstream world. That the article was written in such a way that it came across as the creator's attempt to popularize the word doesn't help much either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:30, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Tansprocess

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can find no coverage of this concept at all, never mind significant coverage. Since the article-creator is the originator of the idea, the article flirts with WP:MADEUP. -- Rrburke (talk) 22:47, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy Delete A11. No references suggests this is completely made up. ubiquity (talk) 23:02, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.