Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tantive IV (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Wikiacc (talk) 20:10, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Tantive IV (band)
NN/Vanity &asymp; jossi fresco &asymp; 00:28, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete until their "official MySpace page!" has a Warner or BMG logo on it. See WP:Music --CastAStone 00:40, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. High school band with no indication of meeting WP:music. Capitalistroadster 00:47, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NN --Rogerd 01:42, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete 49,900 google hits on the exact phrase, surely they're famous. Or maybe not.  They seem to be more crystal ball than WP:MUSIC.  --rob 02:16, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: I moved Tantive iv to Tantive IV (band).  I changed the remainging re-direct of Tantive iv to point to Tantive IV, which is probably more well known.  --rob 02:57, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Most of the Google hits for the exact phrase refer to the Star Wars term. Andrew pmk | Talk 03:07, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN band / vanity. Cnwb 05:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN, and vanity. Per above.  Ban e  s  08:26, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Any band that advertises an "official MySpace page", of all things, has got to be non-notable. &mdash; J I P | Talk 10:31, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Good name, but no WP:MUSIC cigar. - C HAIRBOY  (☎) 18:59, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, bandanity. the wub  "?!"  19:46, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Or an   e    (t)   (c)   (@)  22:16, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete based on the reasons cited above. The evidence is clearly overwhelming and the promotional nature of the entry blurs the point of a wikipedia entry.  We are informational and not promotional.  el_amante 20:26, 12 October 2005
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.