Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanu Sharma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Euryalus (talk) 04:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Tanu Sharma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NOTNEWS. Other than the fact that the subject has accused of sexual harassment against some personnel in India TV, there is no other coverage about her in sources. Fails WP:BIO. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 03:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  LeoFrank   Talk 03:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  LeoFrank   Talk 03:51, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, the fact is that matter is in Indian media as well as Internationally. This is not just a news, but a fight against wrong system where powerful people are tempering system. I am surprise that User:LeoFrank has taken suddenly U-turn. There are enough RS, shows the importance of the article. GKCH (talk) 04:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment You need to go through WP:NOTNEWS. You also need to stop soapboxing the subject on the article. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 05:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment There is an edit war going on between the creator of the article GKCH and the nominator here, which is never good. please discuss on talk page or here. Even though the article might not pass notability and might have soapboxing content, the creator can work on while it is prepared for deletion to save it, nothing objectionable was being added that you have to aggressively start reverting everything. So I would suggest do not get too involved after you have nominated, wait, let the deletion process take its course, limit your involvement to deletion discussion, if you can. GKCH has reported harassment on my talk, please be civil, talk it out for WP:DR. --Ekabhishektalk 03:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, person is now in public domain. This case established also establish her notability. She was already an notable anchor in a News channel.125.63.75.30 (talk) 04:31, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator, and also WP:BLP1E. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:49, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom and Cullen. Clear BLP1E. ukexpat (talk) 12:28, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. "a fight against wrong system where powerful people are tempering system." isn't a valid reason to retain the page.   NQ    talk  12:41, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication she is actually notable for anything except trying to commit suicide, and even that is not clear that it even rises to the level of one-event. Lots and lots of people try to commit suicide.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. NOTNEWs, BIO, RECENTISM, BLP1E ... the list is long. Also, note this at ANI may have some relevance. - Sitush (talk) 16:45, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Odd that there is more listed here than in the article itself. —  Wylie pedia  16:49, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.