Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanuj Banker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 18:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Tanuj Banker

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is about a good ophthalmologist doing good work, but I can't find anything that establishes notability. Most of the article is unsourced, and the awards constitute a long list - but those I can identify are minor. None of the sources are able to establish notability, and searches online don't seem to come up with anything significant. Bilby (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 16:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 16:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, do you still think its a UPE creation? Atlantic306 (talk) 16:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately yes, it was. - Bilby (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:PROMO and many of the claims are not supported in reliable sources so does not pass WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 15:20, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * delete it may be possible to have a page on this person but this page is hopelessly promotional and would have to be rewritten from scratch. Jytdog (talk) 23:18, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Basie (talk) 23:50, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete content is okay. but lacks RS. Dial911 (talk) 03:22, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. CV. One well cited paper (303 cites), 2nd named author. Rest of publications mostly uncited (h-index of around 2). Doesn't pass PROF. Clearly doesn't pass GNG.Icewhiz (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.