Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanveer Ahmed (psychiatrist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Tanveer Ahmed (psychiatrist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:CREATIVE as a journalist and WP:ENT for his entertainment career. his career as a psychiatrist is unremarkable too. yes he's appeared in a few TV shows but nothing significant. his journalist career ended when he was exposed for plagiarism so hardly a well regarded career. and being a local councillor doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN. LibStar (talk) 01:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  02:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  02:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  02:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  02:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Trawling through online news articles he seems to pass the only important criteria - people independent of him care to write about him up to the present day. Perhaps he doesn't pass WP:xxx but there seems ample material to cover a neutral and reasonably useful article. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * could you please supply these sources? LibStar (talk) 11:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Finding coverage by him is hampered by the large amount by him and by others with the same name. There is a number of reviews for his book The Exotic Rissole, some providing bio details about him.
 * Outside the book he gets coverage for other things. "No Bingo" guy, accustaions of plagarism. eg
 * Overal, notable enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Outside the book he gets coverage for other things. "No Bingo" guy, accustaions of plagarism. eg
 * Overal, notable enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Outside the book he gets coverage for other things. "No Bingo" guy, accustaions of plagarism. eg
 * Overal, notable enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Outside the book he gets coverage for other things. "No Bingo" guy, accustaions of plagarism. eg
 * Overal, notable enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Overal, notable enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Overal, notable enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - passes WP:GNG. -- Zayeem  (talk) 08:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.