Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanvi Verma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 21:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Tanvi Verma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An actress with just 2 unotable roles. Says she is a model also which might make her somewhat notable. So I say either delete or userfy. Wgolf (talk) 16:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Google shows quite a few hits on the name associated with her career, but I cannot locate any that would meet WP:RS. I would be willing to change my mind if someone could point out some that do. The results shows she is real, but simply doesn't have the WP:RS to meet Wikipedia guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah I do see she is real-but not enough for her own page. (it seems that when it started she was going to have a career in films, but since she has only had 2 roles and that is it...)Wgolf (talk) 17:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Yup. It kind of sucks to have that many people talking about her, yet nothing reliable enough to use. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:36, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.