Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Harrison (soccer) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Tanya Harrison (soccer)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Was a procedural keep before. During a WP:BEFORE search, I could not find any significant coverage at all; only trivial mentions like this. She does not appear to have the potential to pass WP:GNG and her career was extremely brief. Spiderone 15:50, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  15:53, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No credible evidence of notability. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 12:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete it is time we cut down on the bloat of articles on non-notable football players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable footballer. All online coverage is very routine (i.e., match reports that simply show she was in the squad). Jogurney (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Number   5  7  20:53, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect No solid reason has been given to justify the deletion of this content while valid alternatives exist. If she is not worthy of a standalone article this can be redirected somewhere. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.