Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Heaslip


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Tanya Heaslip

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable author. Lacks independent coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 13:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women,  and Australia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:00, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * This paywalled article on her 2020 book from NT News ("Tanya Heaslip to debut 'An Alice Girl' at Red Kangaroo Books") seems to be promising, but I'm mostly finding radio/podcast appearances (ABC: and 6PR: ) and passing mentions (NT News and Books+Publishing). Bridget (talk) 16:38, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Also found Eclectica Magazine's reviews of Alice to Prague (2019) and An Alice Girl (2020). Bridget (talk) 16:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * A good part of these articles from The West Australian and The Times  talk about her experience at the School of the Air and also discuss her books. There's also a piece on An Alice Girl in a smaller newspaper, the Stock Journal . Bridget (talk) 00:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 5 appears to be written by "STEPHEN SCOURFIELD and School of the Air alumni", so it's not independent. 6 is also a primary source that lacks independence because it's based on an interview with Heaslip in which she is liberally quoted. I don't have access to 7, but if it's a book review, that could contribute to meeting NAUTHOR, but I don't think NT News, Eclectica, and Stock Journal are enough. I also don't have access to the NT News source, but from its title, it appears to be a routine announcement. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:05, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  17:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails NAUTHOR and I haven't found enough significant coverage to meet GNG either. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Thin covg and unconvincing notability claim. 128.252.172.14 (talk) 21:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.