Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tao Huang (general)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. WP:SK1, nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 19:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Tao Huang (general)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

All existing sources are offline which can't prove notability as I have found nothing literary in Google Books search. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and History. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Offline sources are valid for notability. It's not surprising that they're tricky to find on Google Books, since they appear broadly non-English. There are articles on Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese wikis.— Moriwen (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Your claims in Google books search are just mentions only. If you are so confident, please pull WP:THREE from GOOGLE BOOKS with WP:SIGCOV. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per Moriwen. Mccapra (talk) 16:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of sources at Google Books Simonm223 (talk) 16:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Your claims in Google books search are just mentions only. If you are so confident, please pull WP:THREE from GOOGLE BOOKS with WP:SIGCOV. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If you keep asking me for three sources for every one of these on the basis of an essay you like I'm afraid I'll take all day and I do have other things to do. However I randomly pulled one of the sources on google books and it, in fact, has significant coverage. I'd suggest, if you are going to mass AfD notable figures from the Three Kingdoms period, that you be a bit more careful in your literature review before proposing deletion. Simonm223 (talk) 16:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Military,  and China.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep plenty of sources available to build a proper article from. There's no real deletion rationale here. SportingFlyer  T · C  00:25, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. No deletion rationale. Offline sources are perfectly valid. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)


 * NOMINATION WITHDRAWN. I'm happily withdrawing this AfD nomination. What I needed to know Necrothesp explained as "Offline sources are perfectly valid" despite identifiers were mostly missing. This AfD will help me. Thanks to all. Please close the AfD. Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.