Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taotroyism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Kurykh  00:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Taotroyism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable religion, zero google hits, appears to be made up. Contested PROD. -- Gogo Dodo 21:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Detroylete, possible even speedy under WP:CSD. The editor has apparently just stuck his own name in the middle of an existing religion's name. Pure WP:NFT/WP:HOAX material. ~Matticus TC 21:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice (sadly, hoax isn't a speedy criteria) and indef hardblock the creator. I've already blocked him once for his uploading of hoax pages and whatever AGF I had to him is now exhausted. —  iride  scent  23:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again iride  for blocking my 1st listing while I was in the process of editing it. It wasn't reposted because you deleted it, it was reposed because i was in the process of editing it and continued to hit save as I progressed my writing.

My second posting is now questionable as well, when we living in a world where things are created every second, my post gets deleted because it does not produce a Google search.

Try Googlin' some of the fundamental principals of Taotroyism as mentioned in the article and see how many results they produce. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caddcreativity (talk • contribs)
 * Comment to closing admin - you may want to have a look at this before taking anything Caddcreativity says too seriously. Incidentally, it was Gogo Dodo who deleted the previous version of this article. I have, however, deleted your attempts to post your resume in various places four times so far. —  iride  scent  23:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the correction iride, although it was only 2 places - my name and my userpage, which according to wiki's guidelines can be pretty much about anything - that was my "todo list" - finish it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caddcreativity (talk • contribs) 00:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

IMHO, this represents historical relevant religion been stagnant for many milleniums —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.0.202.30 (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No WP:RS. Probable WP:HOAX or simply WP:BOLLOCKS. --Evb-wiki 15:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the support. Troy Vincent Lewald 19:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caddcreativity (talk • contribs)
 * Delete No WP:RS, no WP:V, which makes it WP:OR and WP:N. Wikipedia is not for things made up. WP:HOAX likely, I find it a bit... suspect that the creator of the article's name is "Troy", and this is "TaoTROYism"... There is no proof this "religion" exists, and even if it exists to a very few people, it is certainly not covered by any reliable, third-party sources that can verify it.  Ariel  ♥  Gold  23:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete this should have been speedied. Note that troy is the first name of the user that created it. Proof is just above in this afd, he also emailed me about the SSP case on himself (Caddcreativity) and said so there. This is an obvious hoax. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 23:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the support. Me emailing you about another issue has nothing whatsoever to do with this case, try putting 1+1 together again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caddcreativity (talk • contribs) 23:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't say it did. But it did show your name is in the article title. Try not mixing apples and oranges. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 23:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You sure did - this post has nothing to do with the stockpuppet I originally wrote you about. Fruit salad is the secret to life. Troy Vincent Lewald 23:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caddcreativity (talk • contribs)
 * First of all, Caddcreativity, please sign your talk page comments, by typing four tildes after you are finished commenting (Not by typing your name, as that does not sign the post). Second, I think that you have the wrong impression, I don't know what your emails are about, but you said right here in the article what your name is, and it is there for all to see, thus it is not difficult to put it together with the title of the article. Finally, regarding Rlevse's participation here, if he's dealing with you on another issue, most likely went through your contributions, and your participation here is there as well, so I'd appreciate it if you'd have a little good faith and not accuse respected editors of having an agenda when discussing articles for deletion. Thank you, Ariel  ♥  Gold  23:29, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi ArielGold - I did add my signature by placing Troy Vincent Lewald 23:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC) and that's how it came up as my signature, with my name. Might it have something to do with the RAW formatted signature set in my preferences? The signbot should check for that. I wrote and email toUser:Rlevse in regards to the "stock puppet" i am being accused of having - NOTHING to do with this article whatsoever, and the discussion of puppets can therefore be shifted back to my userpage instead of here. I have plenty of good faith, although people like to dispute things because of their personal beliefs - everyone has their own agenda. Troy Vincent Lewald 23:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caddcreativity (talk • contribs)


 * Hi Ariel - thanks for the input, but give me 60,000 years like christianity had to verify itself and I will do so. I promised the same to user Gogo Dodo && scent Troy Vincent Lewald 23:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.