Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TapToTalk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted, user blanked the page. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 10:31, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

TapToTalk

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable new software, up and coming next big thing. PROD was contested by creator (his rationale is at the talk page. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 20:28, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Just consider if you were the parent of a child who could not talk to you would you not want to know about this very cost effective soloution so that they could communicate with you!!! Deben Dave (talk) 10:29, 9 November 2009 (UTC) Strong Delete This is blatant advertising at its best. --Teancum (talk) 18:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC) Well wikipedia loss and I just hope you never have any children who cant talk Deben Dave (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Dont Delete: This is new product aimed at people with speech difficluties and wiki is an ideal medium to make people aware of this cost effective soloution.Deben Dave (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a place for advertising, product promotion, or advocacy. I sympathize with the aims of this software, but unless someone can demonstrate how it meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria then I can't support having this article here. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 21:07, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a product advertisement platform (see WP:PROMOTION ). --hroest 08:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly meant to be promotional, as seen by the creator's comments here at AFD. Nyttend (talk) 18:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.