Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Glee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tap Tap. Delete and merge isn't actually possible because of boring reasons. But consensus is to not have this article, and a redirects later merging from history if anybody is so inclined.  Sandstein  18:19, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Tap Tap Glee
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was previously deleted by User for not being notable per a PROD nomination by User. Article was recreated by User immediately after Tap Tap Revenge 2 and Template:Tap Tap series were nominated for deletion per the same notability issues. Previous articles Tap Tap Revenge 3, Tap Tap Revenge 4, Nine Inch Nails Revenge, and Nirvana Revenge have all been deleted or redirected per lack of WP:Notability and WP:Reliable Sources. User restored all of these around the same time without consensus, and they are all now back to redirects thanks to User.

I also propose deleting Tap Tap Revenge 2 and bundling it with this AfD. It currently has a separate AD at Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Revenge 2. Also of note is the Tap Tap Series Template which is also up for deletion at Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_June_16.

Edit: Apparently the user who recreated, User:Mayamaya7, is an indefinitely blocked WP:SOCKPUPPET.

- R9tgokunks  ⯃  00:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:35, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * pinging, , as users have participated in redirecting of related articles per failing of WP:GNG. R9tgokunks   ⯃  01:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Any reason why this can't be merged to Tap Tap? Would seem to be a reasonable alternative to deletion. Ya, I'd agree that this title doesn't have significant coverage as is. czar  01:47, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge reliably sourced content to the respective section of its parent (series) article, Tap Tap. czar  09:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

,, , . I also have a separate AfD for Articles for deletion/Tap Tap Revenge 2, but i'm thinking it should be bundled with this as the issues with it are the same. I'm not clear as to how bundlign would be done in this case, though. Any thoughts on deletion/merger of that article? R9tgokunks  ⯃  23:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete/Merge - Non-notable. Maybe a simple sentence in the Tap Tap article would suffice.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect: to Tap Tap.  Nha Trang  Allons! 19:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge with Tap Tap.--QueerFilmNerd (talk) 00:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Bundling only makes sense at the outset when the articles in the article group will not be discussed individually. It makes more sense to ping those who participated above to see the other discussion as well than to merge that discussion here when the above participants may or may not agree that its case is identical to the one under discussion. But this is all besides the point as these articles under discussion should have, reasonably, been redirected as an alternative to deletion before coming to AfD. (not watching, please  as needed)   czar  09:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.