Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tapan Sinha (admiral)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  19:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Tapan Sinha (admiral)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article may fail WP:GNG. No references found to verify the subjects notability. KC Velaga ☚╣✉╠☛  14:39, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per WP:SOLDIER, flag officers are considered notable pretty much automatically, and he is a vice admiral (not your garden variety rear admiral trash) and Director General Medical Services of the Indian Navy. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:31, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep He's a Vice Admiral and is also the Director General Medical Services of the Indian Navy. Uncletomwood (talk) 07:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep clealry passes notability guidelines for military personnel.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:12, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as an admiral per WP:SOLDIER. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Because Vice Admirals are pretty much always considered notable as per WP:SOLDIER.  Omni Flames  ( talk ) 12:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:SOLDIER .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:42, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.