Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tapur Chatterjee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Tapur Chatterjee

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a non-notable model. None of the references highlights her modelling achievements. Sourcing is scrappy to say the least, passing mentions, puff pieces (too many about her efforts to 'clean rivers', which is not a claim for notability advanced in the article) and references which do not get us past WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. Khorang  20:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Women. Khorang  20:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and West Bengal.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Well-known (former) model and grandchild of popular actor. Tapur Chatterjee appears regularly in Indian newspapers and news sites. Jaireeodell (talk) 01:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Keep, After doing a Google News search, I found plenty of sources. She is a popular model in India and majority of news are from Indian publications. The publications mostly look reliable such as India Express and Hindustan Times. I updated with few new citations. Royal88888 (talk) 23:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete BLP. Sources in the article and BEFORE show all promo, interviews, etc. As stated above and  are the best and they are clearly promo and interview. BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per V, BLP and BIO.  // Timothy :: talk  05:03, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete It's all fluff coverage. A Hindustan Times article about your choice's for a child's nursery is not what we're looking for. I can't find anything extra. Oaktree b (talk) 01:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.