Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taqi Nazeer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Taqi Nazeer

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD - apparent autobiographical article about a stage actor of questionable notability. Might just barely pass A7, but I'm not convinced - one of the provided sources is YouTube, and one only mentions the person as part of a larger subject. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. What the nominator neglected to mention is that the other sources provided are a 1200-word article about the subject in The Herald, Scotland highest circulation serious newspaper, and an interview on a web site published by the Victoria and Albert Museum. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Well sourced and since cleaned up. --MoonLichen (talk) 04:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep although calling this "well-sourced" is rather an exaggeration--basic BLP information, for instance, is not verified in the sources. But there are two articles that pay significant attention to him, and I think he passes notability standards per GNG. Drmies (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.