Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tara Chatterjea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Tara Chatterjea

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:PROF or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 19:21, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  19:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  ~ Amkgp  💬  19:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable writer. --Micky (talk) 01:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:19, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:47, 20 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable philosopher.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - no assertion of notability Spiderone  19:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * "no assertion of notability" would be grounds for speedy deletion, but it's clearly inapplicable here, as the article claims she's written several books published by major houses. Do you have another deletion rationale? pburka (talk) 20:26, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * It doesn't appear that any of these works are notable. A quick Google search doesn't seem to turn up with any reliable sources to verify notability. Spiderone  09:06, 4 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.