Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tara Ehrcke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Tara Ehrcke

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Speedy and prod declined. Does not pass WP:ACADEMIC and does not pass WP:BIO. The only verifiable claim to notability is being President of the Greater Victoria Teachers' Association; that is significantly short of what would be required to satisfy Criterion 6 of WP:ACADEMIC. Almost nothing in GScholar and GNews, and no other evidence of significant coverage. Nsk92 (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Nsk92 (talk) 10:19, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * actually no prod was declined, my prod was a blp prod that was "satisfied" by a reference. So you could also try a normal prod too. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:36, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nom has it right – only claim to notability is head of a teacher's union local and this is way short of established standards. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 13:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete - per substantial reasoning of the nom. Claritas § 13:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of the substantial news coverage that might allow someone at this level to be notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:39, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.