Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tara Springett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Tara Springett

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is basically an ad for a spiritual healer that's been tagged for notability concerns since 2011. Only two hits on Gnews, one of which is the Daily Mail, with zero hits for Ulli Springett. Most of the sourcing on the page is either unreliable (as in reads like an ad), regional coverage, or extremely hard to track down, and before I cut down the references was a victim of extreme WP:REFBOMB overkill CiphriusKane (talk) 09:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. CiphriusKane (talk) 09:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CiphriusKane (talk) 09:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - Upon further investigation, it seems the article creator User:DerekComber's entire Wikipedia career has been inserting Springett into Wikipedia articles CiphriusKane (talk) 09:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete thanks for spotting this dreadful piece of self promotion. Mccapra (talk) 11:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Poor referencing, reads like a self-promotion. Probable WP:COI and possible WP:SELFPROMOTE. Majority of books written are independently published. ExRat (talk) 19:45, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing more than a WP:PROMO. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.