Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taragüí


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Taragüí

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article appears to have been created as part of a marketing strategy by the company. There is not support in the article for notability. Because of the nature of the name, I couldn't find any in my brief Google search. The fact that there is no corresponding Spanish-language article to confirm the notability of this brand line suggests that it may not be sufficiently notable there either. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete tried searching on various public forums and came up with nothing. does not pass WP:GNG --Nlfestival (talk) 19:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * There does seem to be some coverage of this subject . I am not familiar enough with the language and sources to determine whether these sources are reliable and whether the coverage is sufficiently substantial. Searching the subject title along with yerba seems to eliminate results for unrelated sports teams etc. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:31, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * It seems to me that this subject should be merged into the parent article on Establecimiento Las Marías. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete There is not support in the article for notability. MatsTheGreat (talk) 10:10, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.