Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarar Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Tarar Media

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Less than one year old company, with a poorly translated article that only references the company's own pages as sources, no WP:RS offered. Nommed for Speedy, another editor disagreed on the basis of the founder's (Waseem Tarar) notability but that does not accrue. Company appears to exist solely to operate Fitraak News so at best it should be merged as a section there, no evidence it warrants its own article. Also noting that User:Win 734 C is heavily involved in creating or editing all 3 articles, it appears there's a potential WP:COI and WP:PROMO issue. JamesG5 (talk) 22:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as per above. Smith  (talk)  22:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as a noticeably newly founded company with no convincing sign of the necessary notability and improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  04:37, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.