Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taraxalisin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Taraxacum officinale. (non-admin closure)  Lourdes  17:06, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Taraxalisin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not really a notable topic. RES2773 (talk) 13:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment This may help put the subject into perspective. As conveyed by its name, Taraxalisin relates to the properties of Taraxacum officinale. IMO a legitimate phytochemical topic. 84.73.134.206 (talk) 08:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to Taraxacum officinale. This seems to be about 2 sentences worth in the "Herbal medicine" section. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Google Scholar search linked above by 84.73.134.206 demonstrates that this is indeed a notable topic because of the amount of research published on this enzyme.  It can be mentioned at Taraxacum officinale, but I think there is sufficient material available in reliable sources from which to expand this stub into a stand-alone article.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to Taraxacum officinale. I agree with the above comments supporting a merge. Power~enwiki (talk) 20:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge to Taraxacum officinale per above. That's a happy result and it's nice to know the fancy name.  --Lockley (talk) 06:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.